Report content. Reply to coverage.

Anyone can report content they believe is illegal under EU or Swedish law. Include:

• The URL or artifact identifier of the content
• An explanation of why you think it is illegal (which law, briefly)
• Your contact details (optional for some categories; required if you want a substantive reply)
• A good-faith statement that the information you provide is accurate

Email legal@heimlandr.com. We assess each report and respond within 14 days. If we act, we provide a written statement of reasons per DSA Art. 17, including the legal basis and your appeal options.

If you are named in MOBILIZR coverage and believe a specific claim is materially inaccurate, you have the right to a written reply that we will publish alongside the original artifact. Send to legal@heimlandr.com:

• The URL of the artifact
• The specific claim you contest
• Your reply (we publish up to 500 words verbatim)
• Your identification (we verify identity before publishing replies, to prevent imposters)

We publish your reply within 7 days of verifying your identity or explain in writing why we cannot. Note that every published claim is attributed to its source — we report what records contain, not what is true; right of reply lets the named party respond on the record.

If your personal data appears in MOBILIZR coverage and you believe the journalistic-purposes exemption under Dataskyddslagen 1 kap 7 § does not justify its publication, you can request removal. We assess each request against the public-interest test and the current caselaw on Article 9 sensitive-category data, and respond within 30 days.

Email legal@heimlandr.com with a clear identification of the data and your basis for requesting removal.

Orders from Swedish or EU authorities should be addressed to legal@heimlandr.com. We accept service in Swedish or English. We log all such orders in the public audit feed (the existence of the order, our compliance response, and the resulting platform actions), per our transparency policy.

Source identities are not disclosed under any circumstances. Not because we are bound to refuse — we do not currently hold utgivningsbevis under YGL — but because our architecture is built so that we do not hold the data. Tip submissions are processed through cryptographically unlinkable paid credits: we receive the tip content but never the tipster identity, and the payment never references the tip content. Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Goodwin v. United Kingdom) further supports general journalism source protection. We will have nothing to surrender if compelled.

• Source disclosure. Architecturally impossible — we do not hold tipster identities.
• Pre-publication review. There is no editorial gate to insert one into.
• Quiet takedowns. Every removal or restriction is logged in the audit feed with the reason.
• Verdict-style language. Every published claim is attributed to a public-record source; nothing is asserted as “true” (see /methodology).

If you disagree with our response to a notice, you can:

• Appeal internally by replying to our written decision; a different team member reviews.
• Use the out-of-court dispute resolution mechanism under DSA Art. 21 (currently being designated by Swedish authorities).
• Bring a court action.